Updated on 2024/04/17
法学博士 ( 東京大学 )
法学修士 ( 東京大学 )
The University of Tokyo Graduate School, Division of Law and Politics doctor course completed
The University of Tokyo Graduate School, Division of Law and Politics master course completed
The University of Tokyo Faculty of Laws graduated
2018.4 - 2019.3
ミラノ・ビコッカ大学客員研究員
2006.4 - 2015.3
慶應義塾大学法学部非常勤講師
2014.3
オーストラリア国立大学客員研究員
2009.4 - 2010.3
大東文化大学法学部非常勤講師
2009.4 -
中央大学法学部教授
2007.4 - 2009.3
中央大学法学研究科非常勤講師
2007.4 - 2009.3
中央大学法学部非常勤講師
1998.4 - 2009.3
大東文化大学法学部教授
2007.4 - 2008.3
慶應義塾大学法学研究科非常勤講師
2005.4 - 2007.3
学習院大学法学部非常勤講師
2006.4 - 2006.9
一橋大学言語社会研究科非常勤講師
2004.10 - 2005.9
一橋大学言語社会研究科非常勤講師
2003.9 - 2004.9
ヨーロッパ大学客員研究員
2003.4 - 2003.9
一橋大学言語社会研究科非常勤講師
2000.11 - 2000.12
パリ第10大学客員教授
1997.4 - 1998.3
新潟大学法学部非常勤講師
1993.4 - 1998.3
大東文化大学法学部助教授
1994.8 - 1995.7
ハーヴァード大学哲学科客員研究員
1993.8 - 1994.8
ニューヨーク大学ロースクール客員研究員
1992.4 - 1993.3
放送大学非常勤講師
1991.4 - 1993.3
大東文化大学法学部専任講師
1990.4 - 1991.3
日本学術振興会特別研究員
Japan Association of Legal Philosophy
IVR(法哲学社会哲学国際学会連合)
equality
multiculturalism
theories of justice
philosophy of law
Humanities & Social Sciences / Legal theory and history / Fundamental law
Limits of the Ideal of Cultural Diversity
Fumihiko Ishiyama
比較法研究 ( 78 ) 200 - 205 2017.1
多文化主義とリベラリズム－その出会いと衝突は何をもたらすのか
石山文彦
思想 ( 965 ) 176 - 194 2004.9
文化多元主義（「ローカル」を読み解くキーワード）
石山文彦
人間会議 ( 2004年夏号 ) 2004.6
リベラリズムと政教一致体制－ジョン・ロールズ『諸国民の法』におけるリベラリズムの自己抑制
石山文彦
法哲学年報 2002 ( 2002年号 ) 98 - 109 2003.10
石山文彦
ジュリスト ( 1244 ) 45 - 50 2003.5
多文化主義理論の法哲学的意義に関する一考察－ウィル・キムリッカを中心として（六・完）
石山文彦
国家学会雑誌 115 ( 9,10 ) 72 - 131 2002.10
善良なるアメリカのディレンマ
石山文彦
法律時報 74 ( 6 ) 2002.6
多文化主義理論の法哲学的意義に関する一考察－ウィル・キムリッカを中心として（五）
石山文彦
国家学会雑誌 114 ( 9,10 ) 645 - 668 2001.10
多文化主義理論の法哲学的意義に関する一考察－ウィル・キムリッカを中心として（四）
石山文彦
国家学会雑誌 114 ( 3,4 ) 111 - 147 2001.4
多文化主義理論の法哲学的意義に関する一考察－ウィル・キムリッカを中心として（三）
石山文彦
国家学会雑誌 113 ( 11,12 ) 986 - 1024 2000.12
多文化主義理論の法哲学的意義に関する一考察－ウィル・キムリッカを中心として（二）
石山文彦
国家学会雑誌 113 ( 7,8 ) 607 - 640 2000.8
多文化主義理論の法哲学的意義に関する一考察－ウィル・キムリッカを中心として（一）
石山文彦
国家学会雑誌 113 ( 1,2 ) 1 - 33 2000.2
石山文彦
法哲学年報 1996 ( 1996年号 ) 43 - 60 1997.10
平等理念と差異との関係に関する一考察－北米の先住民族に関する議論を素材として Reviewed
石山文彦
東京大学博士論文 1991.3
差異と平等（序説）―アメリカのフェミニズムにおける平等概念の包括性
石山文彦
法哲学年報 1989 ( 1989年号 ) 179 - 188 1990.8
価値・論議・真理－規範的論議の客観性をめぐって
石山文彦
創文 ( 285 ) 1988.2
被差別者の優遇策と正義論－アメリカ合衆国における「積極的措置」を中心として Reviewed
石山文彦
東京大学修士論文 1985.12
ウォーミングアップ法学{第2版}
（ Role： Joint editor石山文彦、はじめに――日常生活と法）
ナカニシヤ出版 2021.3
Legal Philosophy Addressing Contemporary Issues (2nd edition)
（ Role： Joint author「移民政策を規律する理念は存在するか――国益，文化の継承そしてグローバルな正義」を担当）
信山社 2018.4
社会学理論応用事典
日本社会学会, 理論応用事典刊行委員会（ Role： Joint author第14章「正義と社会的分配」のうち、「文化的アイデンティティと正義」を担当。）
丸善出版 2017.7
Philosophers of Law Ask You
Hirohide Takikawa（ Role： Joint author）
法律文化社 2016.11
ブリッジブック法哲学[第2版]
長谷川晃, 角田猛之（ Role： Joint author）
信山社 2014.3
Human Rights and Global Justice
Tetsu Sakurai, Hr, Makoto Usami（ Role： Joint authorFumihiko Ishiyama, National Responsibility: What Special Relevance Does It Have to the World As It Is?）
Franz Steiner Verlag 2014
国境を越える正義――その原理と制度 法哲学年報2012
日本法哲学（ Role： Joint author石山文彦、「国境を越える正義：その原理と制度」について、石山文彦、シンポジウムの概要）
有斐閣 2013.11
ウォーミングアップ法学
（ Role： Edit石山文彦、はじめに――日常生活と法、石山文彦、法の2つの分野、石山文彦、法と社会規範）
ナカニシヤ出版 2010.3
Legal Philosophy Addressing Contemporary Issues
（ Role： Joint author「移民政策を規律する理念は存在するか――国益，文化の継承そしてグローバルな正義」を担当）
信山社 2009.4
応用倫理学事典
加藤尚武（ Role： Joint author担当項目：「アファーマティブ・アクション」）
丸善 2007.12
公共性の法哲学
井上達夫（ Role： Joint author）
ナカニシヤ出版 2006.12
現代倫理学事典
大庭健（ Role： Joint author担当項目「アファーマティブ・アクション」「平等」「公民権」「アーミッシュ」「マイノリティ」「多文化主義」「キング」）
弘文堂 2006.11
ブリッジブック法哲学
長谷川晃, 角田猛之（ Role： Joint author）
信山社 2004.9
Universal Minority Rights? A Transnational Approach
Morigiwa Yasutomo, Ishiyama Fumihiko, Sakurai Tetsu（ Role： Joint editor）
Franz Steiner 2004
R・ドゥオーキン著『自由の法－米国憲法の道徳的解釈』
訳者, 石山文彦（ Role： Sole translator）
木鐸社 1999.11
法の臨界［Ⅲ］法実践への提言
井上達夫, 嶋津格, 松浦好治（ Role： Joint author）
東京大学出版会 1999.3
W・キムリッカ著『多文化時代の市民権－マイノリティの権利と自由主義』
角田猛之, 石山文彦, 山崎康仕（ Role： Joint translator）
晃洋書房 1998.12
21世紀の主権，人権および民族自決権
越路正巳（ Role： Joint author）
未來社 1998.2
西洋思想大事典
荒川幾男（ Role： Joint author担当項目：「正義」「衡平（法と倫理における）」）
平凡社 1990.6
M・オークショット著『政治における合理主義』
嶋津格, 森村進他（ Role： Joint translator）
勁草書房 1988.9
人間的秩序－法における個と普遍
森際康友, 桂木隆夫（ Role： Joint author）
木鐸社 1987.9
現代の法哲学者たち
編著, 長尾龍一（ Role： Joint author）
日本評論社 1987.8
リベラルな多文化主義は世界的に普及し得るか―――その条件を探究する (書評 ウィル・キムリッカ『多文化主義のゆくえ―――国際化をめぐる苦闘―――』（稲田恭明・施光恒訳、法政大学出版局、2018年）)
石山文彦
社会理論研究 ( 20 ) 117 - 120 2019.12
書評：辻内鏡人著『現代アメリカの政治文化－多文化主義とポストコロニアリズムの交錯』
アメリカ史研究 ( 25 ) 30 - 32 2002.10
書評「Will Kymlicka,Contemporary Political Philosophy」
国家学会雑誌 106 ( 1,2 ) 1993.2
書評：小林公著『合理的選択と契約』
Hirata Toru
ジュリスト 7 ( 1004 ) 136 - 140 1992.7
書評：長谷川晃著『権利・価値・共同体』
ジュリスト ( 1004 ) 1992.7
書評：長尾龍一著『神と国家と人間と』
ジュリスト ( 1004 ) 1992.7
書評：桂木隆夫著『自由社会の法哲学』
ジュリスト ( 1004 ) 1992.7
V・ヴァンバーグ著『自生的市場秩序と社会の諸ルール － F．A．ハイエクの文化の進化論の批判的検討』
訳者, 石山文彦
現代思想 19 ( 12月号 ) p140 - 159 1991.12
書評「Joseph Raz,The Morality of Freedom」
国家学会雑誌 102 ( 1,2 ) p119 - 122 1989.1
T・キャンベル著『マルクスの社会理論と法（下）』
訳者, 石山文彦
法学教室 ( 12月号 ) 1987.12
T・キャンベル著『マルクスの社会理論と法（上）』
訳者, 石山文彦
法学教室 ( 11月号 ) 1987.11
「多様性の価値はどこにあるのか―企画趣旨説明―」
石山文彦
日本法哲学会2023年度学術大会 2023.11
Against misleading criticisms of accommodating cultural differences in law
Fumihiko Ishiyama
IVRJ 2023 2023.9
移民受入反対論／社会的安定性要求／非理想理論
「世界正義論と立法理学の統合によるグローバル立法理学の基盤構築」（科研費研究・基盤Ｂ）に関する研究会 2017.12
Cultural Diversity and Justice
The 79th Congress of Japan Society of Comparative Law: Mini-Symposium C 2016.6
Cultural Values and Global Justice International conference
XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy 2013.7
グローバル正義と法
「グローバル化による法の変容可能性」研究会 2013.4
神島裕子報告へのコメント
中央大学政治学研究会・中央大学国際政治研究会 2012.12
「国境を越える正義――その原理と制度」について
日本法哲学会2012年度学術大会 2012.11
マルチカルチャリズムとは何か―――海外における理論と実際―――
大阪経済法科大学アジア太平洋研究センター 市民アカデミア 2012.10
多文化主義と文化政策論の課題
一橋大学大学院社会学研究科市民社会研究教育センター:|文化政策研究会 2011.11
Collective Responsibility and Global Justice: How Special is Nation in Miller’s Theory?
第10回神戸記念レクチャー「人権とグローバルな正義」東京セミナー 「グローバルな正義とナショナリティ──David Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice をめぐるシンポジウム」 2011.7
多文化主義と国籍
東京弁護士会夏期合同研究第８分科会 2011.7
各報告へのコメント
中央大学国際関係法研究会・日本比較法研究所共催|国際共同ワークショップ「多文化主義と人権」 2010.6
多文化主義の視点から
日本法社会学会学術大会：ミニ・シンポジウム「多文化社会と法文化」 2005.5
Conservatism in Liberal Multiculturalism International conference
The IVR 21st Congress 2003.8
リベラリズムと宗教
日本法哲学学術大会報告ならびにシンポジウム 2002.11
マイノリティの言語権をめぐって
神戸大学国際文化学部主催シンポジウム 1999.11
State Neutrality and Language Policy International conference
The IVR 19th Congress 1999.6
A 'Distinctivery Liberal'Theory of Minority Rights?
IVR日本支部主催 第5回神戸レクチャー.コメント 1998.11
多文化状況とリベラリズム
日本法哲学会学術大会報告ならびにシンポジウム 1996.11
グローバル化による憲法秩序の規律空間の変容とその課題
Grant number：22H00782 2022.4 - 2025.3
日本学術振興会 科学研究費助成事業 基盤研究(B) 慶應義塾大学
山元 一, 伊藤 一頼, 近藤 圭介, 寺田 麻佑, 大野 悠介, 齋藤 民徒, 興津 征雄, 高山 佳奈子, 西谷 祐子, 小畑 郁, 江島 晶子, 根岸 陽太, 横山 美夏, 石山 文彦, 須網 隆夫, 渕 圭吾, 栗島 智明
Grant amount： \16120000 （ Direct Cost: \12400000 、 Indirect Cost： \3720000 ）
Construction of a philosophical foundation of Global Legisprudence by unifying legisprudence and theories of global justice
Grant number：15H03288 2015.4 - 2018.3
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) The University of Tokyo
INOUE Tatsuo, TAJIMA Masaki, KATSURAGI Takao, ISHIYAMA Fumihiko, OE Hiroshi, INADA Yasuaki, HASHIMOTO Tsutomu, OKUDA Junichiro, TAKIKAWA Hirohide, YOKOHAMA Tatsuya, MATSUMOTO Mitsuo, TANIGUSHI Koichi, FUJIOKA Daisuke, OHYA Takehiro, INOUE Akira, IKEDA Hirono, KAKU Shun, YOSHINAGA Kei, KIRA Takayuki, URAYAMA Seiko, ANDO Kaoru, YONEMURA Kotaro, MORI Yuichiro, HIRAI Mitsuki, MATSUDA Kazuki
Grant amount： \18330000 （ Direct Cost: \14100000 、 Indirect Cost： \4230000 ）
The purpose of our research is to construct a new philosophical foundation of ‘global legisprudence’ by developing and integrating the theoretical resources of legisprudence and global justice. We revealed that the conventional theories of legisprudence which almost exclusively focused on domestic legislation could not appropriately deal with the problems that domestic legislation and global order formation interacted with each other. Then we presented some guides for division of labor between domestic legislation and global law-making, and explored how to guarantee democratic accountability of both. Thereby we built a philosophical foundation of global legisprudence.
Problems and possibilities of interdisciplinary legal study and legal education in an age of globalization
Grant number：15H03304 2015.4 - 2018.3
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) Keio University
YAMAMOTO Hajime, MATSUMOTO Emi, FUJITANI Takeshi, MATSUO Hiroshi, MATSUDA Takeshi, IGIMI Mariko, SUAMI Takao, ISHIYAMA Fumihiko, OGINO Nao
Grant amount： \16120000 （ Direct Cost: \12400000 、 Indirect Cost： \3720000 ）
With respect to human rights theory, we examined the relationship between International human rights treaty organizations and domestic jurisdictions, and the legal methods available for responding to new legal issues surrounding international family relations. As for public law theory, we examined how globalization is influencing public law paradigms. In administrative law, we examined "democratic legitimacy" in administrative process. In terms of criminal law, we examined how laws and regulations differ between each country based on culture and religion. As for commercial law, we examined orders that can substitute state orders. In relation to jurisprudence, we discussed how the balancing of interests is dominating legal thinking in a globalizing world. As for legal education under globalization, we discussed the significance of supporting legal and judicial reform, and that of legal education provided by Japan to other Asian countries.
Legisprudential Foundation Building for the Legislative System Reform
Grant number：24330001 2012.4 - 2015.3
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) The University of Tokyo
INOUE TATSUO, TAJIMA Masaki, KATSURAGI Takao, ISHIYAMA Fumihiko, OE Hiroshi, INADA Yasuaki, HASHIMOTO Tsutomu, OKUDA Junichiro, TAKIKAWA Hirohide, YOKOHAMA Tatsuya, MATSUMOTO Mitsuo, TANIGUSHI Koichi, FUJIOKA Daisuke, OHYA Takehiro, INOUE Akira, KONOE Sara, KAKU Shun, YOSHINAGA Kei, ANDO Kaoru, YONEMURA Kotaro, IKEDA Hirono, KIRA Takayuki, URAYAMA Seiko, HIRAI Mitsuki
Grant amount： \17810000 （ Direct Cost: \13700000 、 Indirect Cost： \4110000 ）
Our research developed, both thematically and methodologically, the project of the new theoretical movement of ‘legisprudence’, which has come to the fore in the world of international legal philosophy in the past few years. We investigated deeply into the new urgent problems of our legislative system, which is now undergoing a profound change owing to the structural transformations of the Japanese political practice. We showed that the conventional legislation-studies focused on the routine process and techniques of bill-formation and the specific legislative policies cannot meet the challenges posed by these problems of structural change. Two advocate a more promising alternative, we developed the theoretical resources of ‘legisprudence’ and presented some philosophical guides for a normative conception of the comprehensive legislative system design, thereby building the ‘legisprudential’ foundation of the legislative system reform.
Legal-philosophical reconstruction of the study of legislation as
Grant number：21330001 2009 - 2011
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) The University of Tokyo
INOUE Tatsuo, TAJIMA Masaki, KATSURAGI Takao, ISHIYAMA Fumihiko, OE Hiroshi, OKUDA Jyunichiro, HASHIMOTO Tsutomu, INADA Yasuaki, TAKIKAWA Hirohide, MATSUMOTO Mitsuo, TANIGUCHI Koichi, OHYA Takehiro, INOUE Akira, YOSHINAGA Kei, KAKU Shun, ANDO Kaoru
Grant amount： \16380000 （ Direct Cost: \12600000 、 Indirect Cost： \3780000 ）
This research developed the study of legislation which is still in a germinal stage in Japan. We reconstructed it by combining it with the new theoretical movement of'legisprudence' which appears in the world of international legal philosophy these days. Our research elucidated the basic conditions for the effectiveness and legitimacy of the entire system of government which produces, reevaluates and revises law. Thereby it indicated the direction in which we can contribute to the qualitative improvement of legislation as a whole and protection of its democratic legitimacy based on the functional analysis and normative evaluation of the entire process of legislation.
Theoretical Foundation Building for Philosophy of Law as Public Philosophy
Grant number：15330002 2003 - 2005
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) The University of Tokyo
INOUE Tatsuo, TAJIMA Masaki, KATSURAGI Takao, ISHIYAMA Fumihiko, OHE Hiroshi, TAKIKAWA Hirohide
Grant amount： \11400000 （ Direct Cost: \11400000 ）
Our research aimed to reconstruct philosophy of law as public philosophy by investigating comprehensively into the philosophical basis and normative implications of the concept of publicness. It was focused on the three tasks : (1)assessing the comparative merits and demerits of the competing conceptions of publicness, and constructing a unifying theory that can adequately accommodate their tensions and turn them into fruitful complementarities ; (2)presenting new approaches to the traditional issues about the concept of law by exploring into the internal connection between the concept of law and that of publicness ; and (3)elucidating the mediating role of positive law and its institutional structure in turning the ideal theory of publicness into reality under non-ideal conditions. Our results are as follows
Task (1) : We have found the following conclusions warranted. First, the competing traditional conceptions of publicness can be adequately characterized and contrasted by classifying them into the three models : sphere-based theory, agent-based theory and process-based theory. Second, the traditional three models are inadequate to get over the legitimacy-crisis in contemporary pluralistic societies. Third, the new fourth model, reason-based theory that we constructed as an alternative to the traditional models can work as a unifying theory that overcomes their limits and defects and rescues their complementary merits by articulating the underlying principle that they need as their normative ground and constraint.
Task (2) : We have shown that the conceptual distinction between the first-order and second-order publicness and the related one between publicness in law and publicness of law implied by reason-based theory give us the best theoretical vantage point from which we can elucidate the internal connections between law and publicness and identify the crucial normative issues neglected in the conceptual analyses and debates about the nature of law. To exemplify this point, we discussed the issues of duty to obey law, revolutionary creation of law, limits of law and others
Task (3) : We have reached the conclusion that positive law can effectively sustain and develop the public order of contemporary societies only if two conditions are met. First, to enhance the publicness in law, both legal interpretation and legislation must be informed and guided by a more principled deliberation on substantive and specific public values (the first-order publicness) than it is now the case. Second, to secure publicness of law, the institutional structure for legal decision making must be designed not just with the view of improving its quality in terms of the first-order publicness but also with full consideration for the second-order publicness. We have realized that legisprudence (the theory of legislation), now emerging in contemporary legal philosophy, can play an indispensable role in finding effective ways to meet these conditions and that we have to organize a new joint research in legisprudence to develop the present one
Part of the results of our research was presented in international settings. Inoue published two papers in internationally coauthored books as shown in the References below. Inoue and Takikawa presented their papers at the World Congress of the international association of Legal and Social Philosophy (IVR) held at Granada in 2005. Takikawa's paper was published in the proceedings of this conference, and Inoue's paper is to appear in a new book edited by Luc Wintgens now in preparation for publication. Domestically, a book that is comprised of the contributions by all the investigators and collaborators for our project is forthcoming from Nakanishiya Shuppan
The multi-layered diversification of public spheres and the reconstruction of legal system
Grant number：13620003 2001 - 2002
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) The University of Tokyo
INOUE Tatsuo, TAKIKAWA Hirohide, ISHIYAMA Fumihiko, KATSURAGI Takao, NOZAKI Ayako, OOYA Takehiro
Grant amount： \3400000 （ Direct Cost: \3400000 ）
Our research aimed to carry out the following three tasks : (1) to identify new challenges to sodal order-formation presented by the multi-layered diversification of public spheres in the contemporary world ; (2) to construct a higher-order principle that can respect the autonomy of each of the diverse public spheres and promote their cooperation based on a functional complementarity ; and (3) to reconstruct the basic categories of legal philosophy that can shape the basic structure of legal system on a basis of such higher-order public principle. Our results are the following :
(1) We have shown that the governmental control based on the conventional private/public dichotomy has lost its efficacy m the context of a variety of emerging social phenomena : gender-discrimination and domestic violence, the use of market in supplying the kind of "public goods" that fit the ordinary people's needs of life, the division of labor between the public and private in health insurance, the multicultural conflict about the demarcation of the public and private and the ambivalent relationships between the digital empowerment and individual freedom and privacy.
(2) We have shown that the conventional models of the public (the spherical model, the agent-centered model and the procedural model) are inadequate to meet the challenges of multi-layered diversification of public spheres. As a more promising alternative, we presented a reason-oriented model of the public that requires us to give public justification open to the heterogenic perspectives of the others on a basis of the universalistic concept of justice as combined with the test of reversibility.
(3) We have shown that the dominant schools of legal philosophy such as liberalism, communitarianism, republicanism and law and economics' are all pressed to reshape their basic concepts and principles and that the justice-based reason model of the public enables us to overcome the discrimination and repression in the 'private spheres." We have also pointed out that the other-regarding and justice-based model of the public help us to revitalize the market supply of the public goods and reunite the civic virtue and openness to cultural diversity within the framework of liberal rights and principles of constitutional democracy.
現代英米の平等論における普遍主義と特殊主義
Grant number：02951128 1990
日本学術振興会 科学研究費助成事業 奨励研究(特別研究員) 東京大学
石山 文彦
Grant amount： \1000000 （ Direct Cost: \1000000 ）
